1.0 OBJECTIVE
To lay down the procedure for Verification of Compendial Methods
2.0 SCOPE
This SOP is applicable for the verification of Verification of Compendial Methods in Company
3.0 BACKGROUND
NIL
4.0 RESPONSIBILITY
4.1 Scientist – Analytical Research for preparation and execution of Analytical Method verification Protocol and Summary reports.
4.2 Group leader – Analytical Research Department shall review the Analytical Method Verification Protocols and Summary Reports
4.3 Head – Analytical Research and Head – Quality Assurance of their designees to approve the Analytical Method verification Protocol, Summary Reports and ensure compliance.
5.0 PROCEDURE
5.1 The
objective of validation of an analytical procedure is to demonstrate that it is
suitable for its intended purpose[ICH].
5.2 Validation
is required for identification tests, Quantitative tests for impurities'
content, Limit tests for the control of impurities and Quantitative tests of
the active moiety in samples of drug substance or drug product or other
selected component(s) in the drug product.
5.3 The objective of the analytical procedure
should be clearly understood since this will govern the validation
characteristics which need to be evaluated.
Typical validation characteristics which should be considered are listed
below: Accuracy, Precision [Repeatability, Intermediate Precision], Specificity, Detection Limit, Quantitation Limit, Linearity and Range.
5.4 Method Validation is not required for compendial methods, but
you need to verify the method.
5.5 Verification is not
required for basic compendial test procedures that are routinely performed
unless there is an indication that the compendial procedure is not appropriate
for the article under test. Examples of basic compendial procedures include,
but are not limited to, loss on drying, residue on ignition, various wet
chemical procedures such as acid value, and simple instrumental methods such as
pH measurements.
5.6 The verification process for
compendial test procedures is the assessment of whether the procedure can be
used for its intended purpose, under the actual conditions of use for a
specified drug substance and/or drug product matrix.
5.7 The process of assessing the
suitability of a compendial analytical test procedure under the conditions of
actual use may or may not require actual laboratory performance of each and
every analytical performance characteristic listed in the table.
5.8 The methods
such as titrations, chromatographic procedures (related compounds, assay, Limit
tests) and Spectroscopic tests etc..
5.9 Based on the
Information available at USP <1226>, we are listed the method
verification characteristics in the following table.
**
Solution and mobile phase stability is
required
€ Perform system suitability resolution to
confirm specificity, if specified in the method.
6.0 Annexures
Nil